Research paper

Download the research paper (PDF)

Evidence cut-off: 5 September 2026.

The gap is large, but measurement matters

Manufacturing value added measures production after intermediate inputs, while gross exports count imported content repeatedly across borders. Comparisons should use constant-price value added, employment, productivity, product composition and domestic value in exports. Exchange-rate movements can distort current-dollar rankings.

China accumulated a manufacturing stock

Decades of high investment created plants, ports, power systems, industrial parks, tooling capacity, engineering teams and specialised suppliers. These complementary assets lower lead times and coordination costs. A new entrant buys access to an ecosystem, not merely labour at a quoted wage.

Supplier density is a production technology

Complex products require thousands of components, tests and design changes. Geographic and organisational proximity among assemblers, component makers, tool shops and logistics firms accelerates problem-solving. India has strong clusters, but depth varies sharply by sector and region.

Wages must be compared with productivity

Unit labour cost relates compensation to output, not to the number printed on a payslip. A higher-wage plant may remain competitive when workers, machines, quality systems and supply chains produce more saleable output per hour. Informal employment also complicates direct wage comparisons.

Infrastructure is about reliability

A highway or port adds value when schedules, customs, warehousing, power quality and digital documentation work together. Average transit time is less informative without variation: manufacturers hold costly inventory when delivery is unpredictable. Logistics performance should be evaluated corridor by corridor.

Capital goods and intermediate inputs

Manufacturing capability deepens when domestic firms can produce machinery, electronics, chemicals, materials and precision components. Imports can raise competitiveness by supplying better inputs and technology; restricting them without local substitutes can raise costs and weaken exports.

Scale, standards and learning

Large orders spread fixed costs for certification, testing, tooling and automation. Repeated production supports learning-by-doing and process discipline. Policy can help firms cross these thresholds, but protected scale without competition may preserve low productivity rather than create export capability.

India's strengths are real and uneven

India combines a vast market with capabilities in automobiles, pharmaceuticals, engineering, refining, chemicals, textiles and digital services. Electronics assembly has expanded. Yet domestic value, component depth, research intensity and productivity differ widely; national averages conceal leading states and lagging regions.

Services are embedded in manufactured exports

Design, software, finance, transport, communications, certification and after-sales support contribute value to goods. India's service capabilities can support industrial upgrading, while manufacturing generates demand for technical services. Treating the sectors as rivals obscures their complementarity.

Employment is not automatic

Manufacturing growth may be capital-intensive, and automation changes task demand. Job creation depends on sector mix, firm entry and growth, labour-force participation, urban housing, transport, workplace safety and training. Women's access to safe and reliable work is a major unused source of capability.

Incentives need additionality tests

Production-linked support can offset early scale disadvantages, but evaluation should ask what occurred because of the subsidy. Gross investment, assembly output or mobile-phone exports may overstate domestic capability if imported content and public cost are ignored. Sunset rules and competition reduce dependency.

Global diversification creates an opening

Firms are diversifying supply chains for resilience and market access, but relocation is selective rather than a wholesale exit from China. India competes with economies offering established trade agreements, supplier bases and predictable administration. Market size helps only when firms can export efficiently as well.

What a serious scorecard should track

Track real manufacturing value added per worker, firm-size distribution, capital intensity, electricity reliability, logistics time and variance, domestic value in exports, product complexity, female employment, supplier certification, research, emissions intensity and survival after incentives. Report sector and state detail, not only national totals.

A long-horizon industrial strategy

The durable agenda is cumulative: stable macro policy, competitive inputs, infrastructure maintenance, urban systems, trade facilitation, vocational and engineering quality, technology diffusion, credit for productive firms and predictable regulation. Capability grows through repeated delivery, measurement and correction.

Evidence assessment

Strong: China's manufacturing scale and export breadth substantially exceed India's, and the difference extends beyond nominal wages. Strong: Infrastructure, supplier networks, productivity, inputs, finance, standards and skills interact as complements in manufacturing competitiveness. Probable: Supply-chain diversification offers India significant opportunities, but gains will be selective and conditional on execution. Contested: The net additional value, employment and spillovers created by particular subsidy and protection programmes. Unsupported: The claim that low wages or one incentive scheme alone can recreate a mature manufacturing ecosystem.