Research paper

Download the research paper (PDF)

Evidence cut-off: 5 September 2026.

An inland node in the Kongu region

Kodumanal lies near the Noyyal river in present-day Erode district. Passes through the Western Ghats and routes across the Tamil plain made this landscape a link between the Kerala coast, interior resource zones and the Kaveri system. Ports depended on such inland corridors.

Habitation and cemetery

Excavations revealed both living and mortuary areas. Houses, working debris and domestic ceramics show production within a settlement, while megalithic burials contain different selections of objects. Keeping habitation and grave contexts separate prevents ritual deposits from being mistaken for everyday consumption.

Stone-bead production

Raw stone, partially worked pieces, drilling debris, failed objects and finished ornaments reconstruct stages of lapidary work. Carnelian, quartz, beryl and other materials moved through varied technical sequences. The evidence points to production for exchange beyond household needs.

Communities of practice

Different drilling and shaping methods need not represent fixed ethnic groups. Skills can move through apprenticeship, itinerant specialists and interaction between workshops. Technology reveals learned practice more securely than the ancestry or language of each craftsperson.

Iron and steel

Furnaces, slag, iron objects and access to regional ores make metallurgy central to Kodumanal. Some research connects the wider region with high-carbon steel traditions. Demonstrating a specific production recipe requires analysed slag, furnace remains and metal microstructure; literary references alone cannot prove it.

Textiles and other crafts

Spindle whorls and associated evidence indicate fibre working alongside ornaments and metals. Craft activities varied in scale and spatial concentration. ‘Industrial’ is useful for sustained production but should not imply mechanised factories or a single managerial institution.

Tamil-Brahmi on pottery

Inscribed potsherds include personal names and short marks written in Tamil-Brahmi, sometimes with Prakrit elements. They show writing in non-monumental settings connected to containers and daily practice. A name on a sherd does not automatically identify the owner, occupation or ethnicity of the entire settlement.

Ceramics, chronology and external objects

Black-and-red ware, russet-coated and other ceramics support regional sequencing. Coins and imported objects help trace connections, but a Roman object does not create a Roman colony and may have travelled through several intermediaries. Dates depend on stratified association and scientific samples.

Burials and social difference

Megalithic graves vary in construction and contents, including beads and iron objects. Unequal assemblages may reflect status, age, role, ritual choice or preservation. Grave wealth offers evidence of differentiation without yielding a complete social hierarchy.

The wider exchange system

Kodumanal demonstrates how raw-material procurement, manufacturing, inland transport and coastal commerce formed one system. Its strongest historical contribution is to shift attention from famous ports and kings to craftspeople and routes that made long-distance exchange possible.

Evidence assessment

Strong: Specialised bead production, iron working, textile activity, habitation, burials and Tamil-Brahmi sherds. Probable: Production exceeded local consumption and served trans-peninsular exchange networks. Contested: Exact beginning of phases, scale of steel production and identification with literary Kodumanam. Unresolved: Workshop organisation, political control, population-wide literacy and identities of individual producers.